State v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rehabilitation is a secondary goal, and it is a stated policy that a defendant’s sentence should increase with the length and nature of the defendant’s prior record.” (citing § 921.002(l)(b), (d))
• “Rehabilitation is a secondary goal, and it is a stated policy that a defendant's sentence should increase with the length and nature of the defendant's prior record.” (citing § 921.002(1)(b), (d))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thompkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-17· cited 10×
• Champagne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-24· cited 6×
• State v. Baron C. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-25· cited 1×
• RENALDO CHAMPAGNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-24

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Banks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-15· cited 258×
• United States v. Benjamin J. Shipley, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-05-29· cited 85×
• State v. Knox
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-12· cited 24×
• State v. Green
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-21· cited 18×
• Kezal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-09· cited 11×
• State v. McKnight
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-21· cited 6×
• State v. Betancourt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-02· cited 6×