Skip to main content

State v. Hall

Citations

  • 487 A.2d 166
  • 145 Vt. 299
  • 1984 Vt. LEXIS 594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Vermont Constitution does not provide greater protection against appellate delay than U.S. Constitution
  • indicating that an excessive delay in the appellate process may violate due process upon a sufficient defense showing of prejudice
  • finding that defendant failed to show any substantial prejudice resulting from seventeen-month delay in producing transcript of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence, and thus concluding that he had not been denied due process of law
  • declining to adopt Barker test, instead requiring “a showing of substantial prejudice”
  • addressing defendant's argument that appellate delay violated Vermont's due process clause
  • addressing defendant’s argument that appellate delay violated Vermont’s due process clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.