Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/29/1987
State v. Hall
Citations
- 406 N.W.2d 503
- 1987 Minn. LEXIS 766
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that admission of expert testimony regarding 12 reporting conduct of an adolescent sexual-assault victim is within the discretion of the district court
- stating that “we hold that in cases where a sexual assault victim is an adolescent, expert testimony as to the reporting conduct of such victims . . . is admissible in the proper exercise of discretion by the [district] court”
- permitting testimony regarding behavioral characteristics frequently seen in adolescent victims of sexual abuse
- where the victim is an adolescent, expert testimony regarding reporting conduct and continued contact with the assailant is admissible in the discretion of the trial court
- where the victim is an adolescent, expert testimony regarding reporting conduct and continued contact with the assailant is admissible in the discretion of the trial court
- “It is within the trial court’s discretion to admit expert testimony concerning the behavioral characteristics typically displayed by adolescent sexual assault victims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl, Wahl, Coyne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-06-05· cited 182×
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
- State v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-29· cited 144×
- State v. GrecingerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-09-18· cited 74×
- Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-25· cited 65×
- State v. MacLennanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-18· cited 53×
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 52×
- State v. ObetaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-24· cited 45×
- State v. SandbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-05-29· cited 19×
- State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-05-01· cited 18×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-04-19· cited 12×
- State v. DanaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-02-12· cited 7×
- State v. WilletteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-03-22· cited 7×
- In Re the Welfare of K.A.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-10-06· cited 6×
- State v. KlosterboerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-28· cited 3×
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-04-05· cited 3×
- State of Minnesota v. Edwin Gochingco ReyesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-01-09· cited 3×
- State v. HakalaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-03-31· cited 2×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-02-27· cited 2×
- State v. FeroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-04-22
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 253×
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 204×
- State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-10-31· cited 88×
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 32×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-10-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.