West Virginia Supreme Court· 4/18/1985

State v. Hall

Citations

329 S.E.2d 860
174 W. Va. 787
1985 W. Va. LEXIS 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding “[i]t is not enough for the prosecution to simply say that he provided the defense all evidence he chose to put in the file”
“Viewing the record as a whole, we conclude that the jury’s verdict might have been different had the jury been allowed to hear Green’s prior inconsistent statement.”
\we conclude that the jury's verdict might have been different had the jury been allowed to hear Green's prior inconsistent statement... . [A] reasonable doubt might well have been created\
“we conclude that the jury’s verdict might have been different had the jury been allowed to hear Green’s prior inconsistent statement. ... [A] reasonable doubt might well have been created”
\Impeachment of a witness can occur by several methods. One is through cross-examination on a prior inconsistent statement. Another technique is to offer a witness whose testimony is inconsistent with the first witness's.\
statement of key prosecution witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.