State v. Hadley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• officer did not need to readvise the defendant after a \two or three minute drive\ to the police station, because questioning related to the same offense and the circumstances of interrogation had not \materially changed\
• officer did not need to readvise the defendant after a “two or three minute drive’ ’ to the police station, because questioning related to the same offense and the circumstances of interrogation had not “materially changed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Metz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 14×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Caraher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-02· cited 274×
• State v. Isiah
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-10-18· cited 56×
• State v. Davidson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-03-12· cited 45×
• State v. Vu
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 36×
• State v. Foster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 28×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-08-15· cited 18×
• State v. Rivas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-18· cited 13×
• State v. Zigler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-14· cited 11×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 10×
• Miller v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-13· cited 5×