State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Although the hour of the interrogation was late [2:00 a.m.], it was not coercive in the sense that, combined with the other circumstances, it resulted in defendant’s will being overborne.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lasner
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-12-07· cited 39×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Deford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
• State v. Pollard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-01-25· cited 17×
• State v. Gable
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 16×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-03· cited 10×
• State v. Vasquez-Santiago
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-04· cited 9×
• State v. Hadley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-06· cited 2×
• State v. Maskell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-05-16· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Quinn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-01-20· cited 183×
• State v. Mendacino
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-12-18· cited 62×
• State v. Vu
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 36×
• State v. Foster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 28×
• State v. Hickam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-12-19· cited 12×
• State v. Benton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-08-24· cited 9×
• State v. Eidson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-05-22· cited 3×
• State v. Kinkade
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 2×