Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/20/2023
State v. Haag
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 877
Syllabus
Trial court's admission of a bystander's 9-1-1 call and the cruiser cam recording of the victim's statements at the scene of the incident at defendant's jury trial did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 209×
- State v. StahlOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-08· cited 189×
- State v. SilerOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-25· cited 77×
- State v. KnechtOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-19· cited 20×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-02· cited 10×
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-12· cited 8×
- State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.