State v. Cook
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2157
Syllabus
Defendant was properly convicted of domestic violence. Trial court had no duty to inquire into defendant's complaints regarding his court-appointed attorney trial court acted properly in removing defendant from the courtroom during his trial the 9-1-1 call of the victim who did not testify at trial was properly admitted into evidence and defendant's prior convictions for domestic violence were properly admitted into evidence.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 306×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-13· cited 291×
- State v. DealOhio Supreme Court· 1969-02-11· cited 166×
- State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court· 1979-05-16· cited 146×
- State v. Creech (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-29· cited 60×
- State v. DukesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-07· cited 23×
- State v. TateOhio Supreme Court· 2014-01-15· cited 21×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-08· cited 13×
- State v. DobyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-09· cited 11×
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-12· cited 8×
- State v. JozwiakOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-13· cited 8×
- State v. SchleigerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-18· cited 3×
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-28· cited 3×
- State v. HarmonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.