State v. Gutierrez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[t]he trial court is vested with wide and liberal discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence claimed to be repetitious, remote or irrelevant’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bermudez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-02-18· cited 8×
• State v. Porfil
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-07-30

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-15· cited 81×
• State v. Reddick
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-12-28· cited 46×
• Blum v. Blum
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-22· cited 40×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-06-12· cited 33×
• State v. Hoyeson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-12-08· cited 26×
• State v. Quinones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-22· cited 15×
• State v. Young
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-19· cited 14×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-13· cited 12×
• State v. Brabham
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-07-12· cited 7×
• State v. Mitchell
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-29· cited 6×