South Dakota Supreme Court· 7/11/2001
State v. Guthrie
Citations
- 2001 SD 89
- 631 N.W.2d 190
- 2001 S.D. LEXIS 92
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a trial court has the inherent power to fashion appropriate sanctions for discovery violations
- finding that a trial court has the inherent power to fashion appropriate sanctions for discovery violations
- noting that questions relevant to the determination of whether attorney fees are reasonable include (1) what work was actually performed, (2) was the work necessary to prosecute the matter, (8
- acknowledging the court’s power to “regulate trial procedure” and applying that rule to determine “a trial court has the inherent power to fashion an appropriate sanction for discovery violations in criminal cases”
- making this determination in reviewing an order requiring payment of an expert witness fee as a discovery sanction under a statute authorizing the imposition of any discovery sanctions that a court deems warranted
- making this determination in reviewing an order requiring payment of an expert witness fee as a discovery sanction under a statute authorizing the imposition of any discovery sanctions that a court deems warranted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amundson, Miller, Sabers, Konenkamp, Gilbertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 106×
- In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-11-16· cited 39×
- State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-02-05· cited 28×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 26×
- Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-10-27· cited 19×
- Public Entity Pool for Liability v. ScoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-02-12· cited 18×
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-11-20· cited 12×
- Acevedo v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-06-17· cited 6×
- State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-02-13· cited 5×
- State v. SmithersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-10-15· cited 4×
- Tooele Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Tooele City Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 2011-01-11· cited 4×
- Frazier v. DrakeNevada Supreme Court· 2015-09-03
- FRAZIER VS. DRAKENevada Supreme Court· 2015-09-03
- Frazier v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Nevada· 2015-09-03
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1990-07-19· cited 337×
- United States v. Richard A. HornFirst Circuit· 1994-07-25· cited 206×
- John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court· 1991-11-14· cited 141×
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-05-16· cited 123×
- State v. DillonIdaho Supreme Court· 1970-06-25· cited 74×
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 59×
- Welton v. FalconLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-03-11· cited 34×
- Nauman v. NaumanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-06-09· cited 28×
- Chittenden & Eastman Co. v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-12-19· cited 23×
- Hogg v. First National Bank of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-05-14· cited 20×
- Aberle v. RinghausenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-12-16· cited 16×
- City of Winner v. Bechtold Investments, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-07-01· cited 15×
- People v. Superior Court (Fairbank)California Court of Appeal· 1987-05-22· cited 13×
- In Re Waldoff's, Inc.S.D. Mississippi· 1991-09-20· cited 12×
- Emery v. HuntD. South Dakota· 2001-02-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.