State v. Gruen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]rimes proscribing conduct not prohibited at common law or crimes ‘mala prohibita’, which usually result from neglect, do not require any criminal intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• B.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-13· cited 44×
• Sieniarecki v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-30· cited 3×
• State v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-17· cited 2×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-21· cited 1×
• J.Y. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-10-01· cited 1×
• BH v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-13
• Juan Bridon v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morissette v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
• Lambert v. California
  Supreme Court· 1958-01-27· cited 895×
• Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. Minnesota
  Supreme Court· 1910-05-31· cited 204×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-21· cited 105×
• State v. Wershow
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-02-25· cited 76×
• State v. Oxx
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-21· cited 28×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1916-05-18· cited 20×