State v. Gross
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2598
Syllabus
Defendant's sentence for seventeen drug-related, felony convictions of the third and fifth must be reversed because the trial court did not announce postrelease control sanctions at the sentencing hearing, the postrelease control sanction exceeded the statutory max of two years, and because the trial court did not provide the defendant with notice of what circumstances in his case overcame the presumption that his sentences should be served concurrently. However, the trial court correctly did not merge any of the defendant's convictions because different drugs in the same schedule, and even within the same subsection in a schedule, can support separate convictions because each drug has independent significance from the other.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-22· cited 88×
- State v. DukesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-07· cited 23×
- State v. GableOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-29· cited 9×
- State v. DowningOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-05· cited 8×
- State v. MaloneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-07· cited 7×
- State v. VolzOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.