Skip to main content

State v. Grisby

Citations

  • 257 S.W.3d 104
  • 370 Ark. 66
  • 2007 Ark. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that arguments made below but not on appeal are considered abandoned
  • accepting a State appeal because “our holding in [the] case would be important to correct and have uniform
  • Where State failed to raise a separation-of-powers argument below, it was not preserved for appellate review.
  • Where State failed to raise a separation-of-powers argument below, it was not preserved for appellate review.
  • arguments raised below but not on appeal are considered abandoned
  • arguments raised below but not on appeal are considered abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.