Lavoyce Wilder v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Supreme Court has long approved consensual searches because it is reasonable for police to search once they have permission to do so
• holding that consent to search of a vehicle encompassed consent to search a closed container found in the vehicle
• holding that a suspect may delimit the scope of a search for which he has consented
• holding that consent to search authorized search of the trunk absent indication that the consent was more limited
• holding that it was \objectively reasonable for the officer to believe that the scope of the suspect's consent permitted him to open a particular container within [an] automobile\
• holding that it was “objectively reasonable for the officer to believe that the scope of the suspect’s consent permitted him to open a particular container within [an] automobile”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).