Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/12/1977
State v. Graves
Citations
- 237 S.E.2d 584
- 269 S.C. 356
- 1977 S.C. LEXIS 308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the term \operator\ is broader than the term \driver\ because it includes acts such as starting the engine or \manipulating the mechanical or electrical agencies of a vehicle\
- explaining that the term “operator” is broader than the term “driver” because it includes acts such as starting the engine or “manipulating the mechanical or electrical agencies of a vehicle”
- Because statute at issue is penal in nature “we must approach it’s interpretation by-invoking the rule of strict statutory construction and resolve any uncertainty or ambiguity against the State and in favor of the respondent.”
- Because statute at issue is penal in nature \we must approach it's interpretation by invoking the rule of strict statutory construction and resolve any uncertainty or ambiguity against the State and in favor of the respondent.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory, Lewis, Rhodes, Littlejohn, Ness
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-05-06· cited 112×
- People v. SwainSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-05-26· cited 87×
- State v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 26×
- State v. MoydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 19×
- State v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-17· cited 17×
- Huber v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-11-05· cited 12×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
- Ex Parte United Services Auto. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 7×
- Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 2×
- State v. MuldrowCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-05-22· cited 1×
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-10-31
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-02-21
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gallagher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1964-11-30· cited 57×
- Truesdale v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-04-16· cited 43×
- Nicolls v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1971-10-11· cited 41×
- Flournoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1962-10-15· cited 34×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1951-07-13· cited 26×
- State v. MichaelWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1955-05-31· cited 23×
- State v. SheppardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-11-01· cited 20×
- State v. TaftWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1958-03-04· cited 10×
- Savannah Bank and Trust Co. v. ShumanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-11-13· cited 4×
- State v. McCordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-03-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.