Skip to main content
· 3/4/1996

State v. Moyd

Citations

  • 468 S.E.2d 7
  • 321 S.C. 256
  • 1996 S.C. App. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating if objecting party accepts ruling of trial court and does not contemporaneously object to sufficiency of curative instruction or move for mistrial, error deemed cured and issue not preserved for appellate review
  • Dixon represents a narrowing of double jeopardy analysis, and returns the inquiry to the Blockburger test as the lone test for determining whether a prosecution violates the Double Jeopardy Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw, Connor, Hearn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.