State v. Grantham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The time limit is mandatory, although the court may continue the restitution hearing beyond the 180–day limit for good cause if a party so requests before the time limit has expired.”
• reversal of untimely restitution order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Of Washington v. Elyas Kerow
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-02-29· cited 11×
• State v. Chipman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-10· cited 8×
• State of Washington v. Joseph Theodore Jones
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-12-16· cited 2×
• State Of Washington v. Kody Chipman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-10

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davison
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
• State v. Moen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 159×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-02-18· cited 153×
• State v. Tobin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 119×
• State v. Wicke
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-03-01· cited 115×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-27· cited 50×
• State v. Duvall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-07-21· cited 49×
• State v. Prado
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-04-29· cited 21×
• Greenhalgh v. Department of Corrections
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-14· cited 10×