Skip to main content

State v. Grant

Citations

  • 614 N.W.2d 848
  • 2000 Iowa App. LEXIS 6
  • 2000 WL 504538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a district court ruling entered after an appeal was filed may not be considered on appeal
  • requiring further inquiry where couple found sleeping naked in bedroom of third party’s residence and police could not tell relationship between parties or what belonged to whom
  • providing the Fourth Amendment “secures the right of the people to be free from unreasonable government searches,” and one’s expectation of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment “is applicable only to the unwarranted actions of government actors”
  • “The appropriate remedy for such 18 violation is suppression of all evidence directly or indirectly gathered through the search.”
  • homeowner’s consent to search house did not allow police to search defendant’s zipped jacket pocket when defendant was guest and jacket in room where defendant was staying
  • guest in a private home retained a privacy interest in her jacket, and the homeowner did not have authority to consent to search of the jacket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit, Mahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.