· 4/1/1988
United States v. Howard E. Brady
Citations
- 842 F.2d 1313
- 269 U.S. App. D.C. 18
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4057
- 1988 WL 26841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressing “serious doubts” about district court’s finding that defendant had not abandoned a gym bag when he stated in “absolute” terms: “I don’t know whose bag that is. I never saw it before”
- defendant took “crucial initiatives [such as] suggesting that the ticket would have to be retrieved from his room” in the train
- defendant took \crucial initiatives [such as] suggesting that the ticket would have to be retrieved from his room\ in the train
- search of train compartment and luggage; defendant denial that gym bag was his was tantamount to abandonment
- search of train compartment and luggage; defendant denial that gym bag was his was tantamount to abandonment
- defendant clearly consented by saying “go ahead” when detectives asked to search his bag
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wald, Robinson, Silberman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.