Skip to main content
· 4/1/1988

United States v. Howard E. Brady

Citations

  • 842 F.2d 1313
  • 269 U.S. App. D.C. 18
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4057
  • 1988 WL 26841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressing “serious doubts” about district court’s finding that defendant had not abandoned a gym bag when he stated in “absolute” terms: “I don’t know whose bag that is. I never saw it before”
  • defendant took “crucial initiatives [such as] suggesting that the ticket would have to be retrieved from his room” in the train
  • defendant took \crucial initiatives [such as] suggesting that the ticket would have to be retrieved from his room\ in the train
  • search of train compartment and luggage; defendant denial that gym bag was his was tantamount to abandonment
  • search of train compartment and luggage; defendant denial that gym bag was his was tantamount to abandonment
  • defendant clearly consented by saying “go ahead” when detectives asked to search his bag

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Robinson, Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.