State v. Graham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sentence enhancement can apply to accomplices; ignorance of the proximity of the school ground and absence of profit are not valid defenses
• as applied to drug offenses committed within 1,000 feet of a school
• as applied to drug offenses committed within 1,000 feet of a school

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Anderson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 116×
• State v. Silva-Baltazar
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 71×
• State v. Carter
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 35×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-31· cited 24×
• State v. Lusby
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-01· cited 6×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-12· cited 5×
• State Of Washington v. Jennifer Cathryn Dreewes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-01-29

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hoffman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
• State v. Coria
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-11-12· cited 220×
• State v. Boyer
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-01-04· cited 155×
• State v. Rice
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 108×
• United States v. Ramon Falu
  Second Circuit· 1985-10-30· cited 100×
• State v. McKim
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-11-18· cited 58×
• State v. Toomey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-11-05· cited 46×
• State v. Lua
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-07-25· cited 25×
• State v. Zamora
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-10-15· cited 18×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-28· cited 14×
• State v. Abbott
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-09-08· cited 10×