Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/19/1990
State v. Graham
Citations
- 785 P.2d 983
- 246 Kan. 78
- 1990 Kan. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- neither the State nor the defendant is allowed to present expert testimony that invades the province of the jury
- neither the State nor the defendant is allowed to present expert testimony that invades the province of the jury
- police photographer's testimony indicating that defendant was man shown in series of mug shots and photos from scene of robbery should not have been admitted as it invaded province of jury
- police photographer s testimony indicating that defendant was man shown in series of mug shots and photos from scene of robbery should not have been admitted as it invaded province of jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-31· cited 99×
- – State v. Claerhout –Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-12-06· cited 28×
- State v. LumbreraSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 26×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-07-08· cited 25×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-10-10· cited 19×
- LaPOINTE v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-08-28· cited 17×
- State v. 1978 Chevrolet AutomobileCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-06-19· cited 12×
- Jensen v. RunftSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-12-11· cited 8×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-07-24· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.