Skip to main content

State v. Gosnell

Citations

  • 535 S.E.2d 453
  • 341 S.C. 627
  • 535 S.E.2d 458
  • 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conspiracy to traffic cocaine in the amount of 400 grams or more can include conspiracy to traffic lesser amounts.
  • South Carolina conspiracy law does not require proof of overt acts; circumstantial evidence may prove conspiracy.
  • \Conspiracy to traffic in an amount of cocaine contained within a lesser sentencing level than that alleged in the indictment may be proper where the amount involved in the object of the conspiracy is in controversy.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Cureton, Huff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.