Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/13/1995
State v. Gore
Citations
- 456 S.E.2d 419
- 318 S.C. 157
- 1995 S.C. App. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Possession gives rise to an inference of the possessor's knowledge of the character of the substance.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howell, Cureton, Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 101×
- Kelly v. Wauconda Park DistrictSupreme Court· 1987-03-23· cited 88×
- State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-13· cited 73×
- State v. SchrockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-31· cited 61×
- State v. KimbrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-23· cited 42×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-07· cited 41×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-26· cited 36×
- State v. AttardoSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-01-28· cited 24×
- State v. MaxeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-10-30· cited 23×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-28· cited 16×
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-03-08· cited 14×
- State v. McClintonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-08-05· cited 8×
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-07-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.