Skip to main content

State v. Gordon

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 5150

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application to reopen Murnahan ineffective assistance of appellate counsel R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(b) and (B)(1)(g) consecutive sentences for firearm specifications jail-time credit R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(f) continuing jurisdiction to correct jail-time credit errors prejudice to appellant and disqualification of retained counsel. The court denied the applicant's App.R. 26(B) application to reopen. Applicant relied on a former and superseded provision of the Revised Code that prohibited consecutive sentences for firearm specifications. The trial court properly imposed sentence pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g). Applicant suffered no prejudice in trial court's failure to award jail-time credit, because R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(f) grants the court continuing jurisdiction to correct such errors. The Supreme Court of Ohio determined that the trial court had properly disqualified retained counsel.

Judges: Kilbane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.