State v. Gordon
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 5150
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application to reopen Murnahan ineffective assistance of appellate counsel R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(b) and (B)(1)(g) consecutive sentences for firearm specifications jail-time credit R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(f) continuing jurisdiction to correct jail-time credit errors prejudice to appellant and disqualification of retained counsel. The court denied the applicant's App.R. 26(B) application to reopen. Applicant relied on a former and superseded provision of the Revised Code that prohibited consecutive sentences for firearm specifications. The trial court properly imposed sentence pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g). Applicant suffered no prejudice in trial court's failure to award jail-time credit, because R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(f) grants the court continuing jurisdiction to correct such errors. The Supreme Court of Ohio determined that the trial court had properly disqualified retained counsel.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 335×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 116×
- State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 58×
- State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.