Skip to main content

State v. Gordon

Citations

  • 414 S.C. 94
  • 777 S.E.2d 376
  • 2015 S.C. LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding subsection 56- 5-2953(A)(1)(a)(ii) requires that the motorist's head be visible during the recording of an HGN field sobriety test
  • holding section 56-5-2953(A) requires that the DUI suspect's head be visible in the incident site video during the administration of a Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) field sobriety test
  • ruling the requirements of section 56-5-2953(A) were satisfied because, during the administration of the HGN test, the driver's head and the arresting officer's arm were visible and the officer's instructions were audible
  • finding the video recording complied with section 56-5- 2953(A) when the officer's administration of the HGN test was visible on the video recording and focusing on the fact that the video recording included the driver's face, the officer's instructions, and the officer's flashlight and arm
  • \[A]n appellate court is bound by the trial court's factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous.\
  • \The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.\ (quoting Sloan v. Hardee, 371 S.C. 495, 498, 640 S.E.2d 457, 459 (2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Toal, Hearn, Lee, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.