Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/17/2023
State v. Goode
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 863
Syllabus
Trial court's finding—that defendant did not overcome the presumption of prison time required by R.C. 2907.07(F)(3)—was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law, and therefore defendant's six month prison sentence for importuning was not overturned.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. MontezOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-04· cited 10×
- State v. SteinOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-12· cited 7×
- State v. McClellanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-04· cited 6×
- State v. GreyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-31· cited 3×
- State v. BartholomewOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.