Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 10/20/1999

State v. Goodale

Citations

144 N.H. 224
740 A.2d 1026
1999 N.H. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant could not “claim [that] the trial court erred by using the very standard he had [earlier] asked the court to apply”
holding that “fundamental fairness requires that official information concerning prospective jurors utilized by the State in jury selection be reasonably available to the defendant”
affirming the defendant’s conviction, despite finding that he had been subjected to an unfair adjudicatory procedure, because he failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the procedure
\We disagree that the defendant had no interest in knowing the criminal histories of the potential replacement jurors.\
under “invited error” doctrine, party may not avail himself of error into which he has led the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.