· 1/28/2014
State of New Hampshire v. William Ramsey
Citations
- 166 N.H. 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[i]n both ‘double description’ and ‘unit of prosecution’ cases, we examine whether proof of the elements of the crime as charged will require a difference in evidence”
- applying harmless error review to admission of evidence assumed to be in violation of New Hampshire Rules of Evidence and State and Federal Confrontation Clauses
- applying harmless error review to admission of evidence'assumed to be in violation of the New Hampshire Rules of Evidence and State and Federal Confrontation Clauses
- noting that evidentiary rulings are reviewed for unsustainable exercises of discretion
- applying harmless error review to admission of evidence assumed to be in violation of New Hampshire Rules of Evidence and State and Federal Confrontation Clauses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dalianis, Hicks, Conboy, Lynn, Bassett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.