State v. Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting alteration of a material date on the basis that the affidavit also indicated the conduct at issue had occurred \within the last seventy-two hours\ and that the affiant had known the informant for approximately one month
• permitting alteration of a material date on the basis that the affidavit also indicated the conduct at issue had occurred “within the last seventy-two hours” and that the affiant had known the informant for approximately one month

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dunlap v. Wayne
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 110×
• Commonwealth v. Leed, E., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-01· cited 57×
• Greenstreet v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-11· cited 51×
• State v. Greenstreet
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-13· cited 6×
• State v. JOST/OREGON-WASHINGTON RECOVERY CO.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-25· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Blackburn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 61×
• State v. Ingram
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-11-21· cited 15×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-04-10· cited 14×