State v. Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant’s due process rights were not violated when defendant had opportunity to challenge information at sentencing hearing and failed to do so
• \A copy of the presentence investigation report was provided to defendant prior to [sentencing]. Defendant had the opportunity to examine the report and challenge its contents and recommendations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Patience
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-08-14· cited 45×
• State v. Weeks
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2000-10-05· cited 9×
• State v. Speed
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2017-05-04· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gardner v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,935×
• Mempa v. Rhay
  Supreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,589×
• United States v. Samuel E. Story
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-09-01· cited 131×
• People v. Smith
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1985-11-20· cited 103×
• State v. Mincey
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 101×
• United States v. Joe S. Gonzales
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-07-16· cited 51×
• State v. Casarez
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-12-09· cited 42×
• State v. Howell
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-09-30· cited 28×
• State v. Johnson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-07-16· cited 28×
• State v. Hanson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 23×
• State v. Lipsky
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-02-26· cited 22×
• United States v. Robert Ray Houston
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-10-15· cited 16×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-09-19· cited 8×
• State v. Anderson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-07-15· cited 2×
• Johnnie Tasby v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1977-04-05· cited 1×