Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/4/1990
State v. Godwin
Citations
- 790 P.2d 641
- 57 Wash. App. 760
- 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court relied upon and adopted reasoning and construction of language from pre-Sentencing Reform Act of 1981(SRA) case in deciding case involving SRA provisions relating to same language
- court relied upon and adopted reasoning and construction of language from pre-Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA) case in deciding case involving SRA provisions relating to same language
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Petrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SalamancaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-13· cited 15×
- State v. BeerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-12· cited 10×
- State v. BeerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 10×
- In re the Personal Restraint of RangelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-02-17· cited 7×
- In Re RangelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-28
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 328×
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 258×
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 224×
- State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-05-18· cited 43×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-05-11· cited 25×
- State v. ClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-29· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.