Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/29/1987
State v. Clinton
Citations
- 741 P.2d 52
- 48 Wash. App. 671
- 1987 Wash. App. LEXIS 3896
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- codefendants together at three crime scenes, each charged with three counts of first degree rape and three counts of first degree burglary
- fact that rape victim was 67 years old established that she was particularly vulnerable due to advanced age
- equal protection guaranty is implicated where disparate sentences imposed on codefendants who committed the same crimes
- fact that rape victim was 67 years old established that she was particularly vulnerable due to advanced age
- 67-year-old woman is particularly vulnerable to crime of rape due to advanced age
- court held that where the victim of an offense is particularly vulnerable due to advanced age, then that fact alone may, as a matter of law, be used to justify the imposition of an exceptional sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pekelis, Scholfield, Ringold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HandleyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 94×
- State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 92×
- State v. GideonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-04-28· cited 83×
- State v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-16· cited 69×
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-24· cited 29×
- State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-18· cited 28×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 26×
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-07-18· cited 25×
- State v. OksoktarukCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-08-02· cited 16×
- State v. SalamancaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-13· cited 15×
- State v. StuhrCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-01· cited 14×
- State v. HandleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-07-05· cited 12×
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-17· cited 9×
- State v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-05-04· cited 6×
- State v. CaffeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-15· cited 3×
- State v. CaffeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-25· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 272×
- State v. OxborrowWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 152×
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 111×
- State v. BresolinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-05· cited 84×
- State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-11-24· cited 63×
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-04· cited 47×
- State v. PortnoyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-04-15· cited 41×
- STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-06· cited 41×
- State v. AltumCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-04-27· cited 33×
- State v. VazquezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-02-18· cited 33×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-05-11· cited 25×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-11-20· cited 23×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-19· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.