State v. Glenn

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3159

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it did not admit into evidence the entire CARE House interview of the victim the proposed exhibit was not properly authenticated, and portions would have been prohibited by State v. Arnold, 126 Ohio St.3d 290, 2010-Ohio-2742, 933 N.E.2d 775. The trial court did not err by not declaring a mistrial sua sponte as it was not a manifest necessity. Finally, appellant was not denied a fair trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel he cannot demonstrate that the outcome of the proceeding would have been different but for the alleged deficient performance of trial counsel. Judgment affirmed.