State v. Glass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that one interpreting a statute “may neither add to, nor delete, statutory language that is plain and unambiguous language in order to reflect an intent not evidenced in that language” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that one interpreting a statute “may neither add to, nor delete, statutory language that is plain and unambiguous language in order to reflect an intent not evidenced in that language” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that a court’s analysis “must be undertaken from a commonsensical rather than a technical ] perspective, always seeking to avoid giving the statute a strained interpretation or one that reaches an absurd result” (citations omitted)
• a court’s analysis “must be undertaken from a commonsensical rather than a technical ] perspective, always seeking to avoid giving the statute a strained interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harvey v. Marshall
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-14· cited 120×
• Chow v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-07-27· cited 113×
• Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-19· cited 90×
• Stanley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-13· cited 43×
• Downes v. Downes
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-15· cited 38×
• Gilmer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-07· cited 34×
• Warren v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-08· cited 7×
• Matthews v. Housing Auth. Balto. City
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-03-26· cited 5×
• (2006)
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2006-02-23
• Jefferson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-16
• 108OAG108
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2023-09-25
• Maryland Attorney General Opinion 108OAG108
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2023-09-21