State v. Glasby
Citations
- 50 Wash. 598
- 97 P. 734
- 1908 Wash. LEXIS 792
Syllabus
<p>Courts — Rule of Decisions — Federal Question. Questions involving interstate commerce must be controlled by the decisions of the United States supreme court.</p> <p>Commerce — Interstate Commerce — Soliciting Orders for Nonresident. The business of soliciting orders for goods by one in the employ of a nonresident of this state, to be filled by the employer and shipped by him into this state, if the orders are accepted, is interstate commerce, and is not subject to regulation by the enactment of an ordinance requiring the payment of a license fee therefor, regardless of whether there is any discrimination between residents and nonresidents.</p>
Judges: Hadley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court· 1887-03-07· cited 570×
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 324×
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court· 1888-10-29· cited 134×
- Stockard v. MorganSupreme Court· 1902-04-07· cited 63×
- Corson v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1887-03-07· cited 28×
- People v. BunkerMichigan Supreme Court· 1901-07-19· cited 11×
- Bacon v. LockeWashington Supreme Court· 1906-03-09· cited 10×
- City of Titusville v. BrennanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1891-10-05· cited 10×
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court· 1907-03-05· cited 10×
- City of Alma v. ClowMichigan Supreme Court· 1906-12-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.