Skip to main content

State v. Gilmour

Citations

  • 522 N.W.2d 595
  • 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 213
  • 1994 WL 575845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the offenses of dissemination and exhibition of obscene material to minors under section 728.2 and sexual exploitation of a minor under section 728.12(1) are markedly different with respect to the nature of the criminal activity”
  • holding that \the offenses of dissemination and exhibition of obscene material to minors under section 728.2 and sexual exploitation of a minor under section 728.12(1) are markedly different with respect to the nature of the criminal activity\
  • holding ambiguity is present if reasonable minds may differ or be uncertain as to the meaning of the statute
  • noting a mistake-of-age defense is available under section 728.10 for the crime of dissemination or exhibition of obscene material to minors but not available to the crime of sexual exploitation of a minor
  • stating the “offenses of dissemination and exhibition of obscene material to minors under section 728.2 and sexual exploitation of a minor under section 728.12(1) are markedly different with respect to the nature of the criminal activity”
  • “There is no indication in the statutory language that knowledge of age is an element of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Carter, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.