State v. Gillespie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the defendant raises an issue directly or by implication, the prosecutor can present otherwise inadmissible testimony to counteract the negative inference the defense has injected into the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wright
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-05-29· cited 18×
• State v. Williams
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-01· cited 11×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-02-09· cited 3×
• State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Belvin L. Williams, Jr.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-01
• State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Yolonda Washington
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-06-16
• State v. Watson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-07-18
• State of Missouri v. Deandre J. Cothran
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2025-05-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Doyle v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
• Anderson v. Charles
  Supreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 896×
• State v. Hutchison
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-11-25· cited 58×
• State v. Floyd
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-16· cited 40×
• State v. Barton
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-12-18· cited 36×
• State v. Prince
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-09· cited 14×
• State v. Cook
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-12-30· cited 13×
• State v. Steger
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-11-14· cited 7×