State v. Gill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to comply with a similar, 60-day rule mandated release of property from seizure after the owner requested its release
• stating unrepresented parties “are held to the 12 same standards as attorneys with respect to familiarity with required procedures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re 1996 Nissan Sentra
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-25· cited 47×
• State v. Carrasco
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-10-30· cited 21×
• In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-12-22· cited 5×
• State Ex Rel. Lawrence/Douglas County Drug Enforcement Unit v. $17,023 in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-07-03· cited 2×
• In Re $15,379.00 in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-10-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ruiz v. Hull
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1998-04-28· cited 81×
• State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-11-20· cited 41×
• Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-09-03· cited 29×