Skip to main content
· 11/20/1997

State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 948 P.2d 499
  • 190 Ariz. 371
  • 256 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The provision of one exemption in a statute implicitly denies the existence of other unstated exemptions.”
  • \The provision of one exemption in a statute implicitly denies the existence of other unstated exemptions.\
  • “The provision of one exemption in a statute implicitly denies the existence of other unstated exemptions.”
  • “Special action jurisdiction is appropriate because . . . resolution of the issues will avoid undue expense and delay for both the litigants and others.”
  • “Under the claims statute, no action may be maintained when a plaintiff has failed to file a timely, sufficient notice of claim, including all elements required by law, with a person authorized by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure to accept service for the defendant agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Toci, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.