Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/20/2018
State v. Gilbert
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3789
Syllabus
Motion for a new trial, Crim.R. 33, Crim.R. 43, right to counsel, witness recantation. The trial court did not violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment and due process rights when it removed him from the courtroom during the hearing on his motion for a new trial. The trial court did not err when it denied the defendant's motion for a new trial.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 561×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 286×
- People v. HOMMERSONAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-03-25· cited 43×
- State v. WaddyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 40×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-02-02· cited 18×
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-06· cited 12×
- State v. IrwinOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-09-30· cited 11×
- State v. BolanOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-08· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.