Arizona Supreme Court· 5/30/1978

State v. Gilbert

Citations

581 P.2d 229
119 Ariz. 384
1978 Ariz. LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

outlining bifurcated trial procedure formerly used to determine prior convictions pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-604(P), 1996 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch. 34, § 1
discussing bifurcated trial procedure for determining prior convictions under prior statute
fact that the same jury has determined the defendant’s guilt does not render it incapable of fairly determining the truth of an allegation of a prior conviction
“The defendant does not, however, suffer this same prejudice when a jury is determining the truth or falsity of a prior conviction after the conviction of the defendant for the offense charged.”
“The defendant does not, however, suffer this same prejudice when a jury is determining the truth or falsity of a prior conviction after the conviction of the defendant for the offense charged.”
“The defendant does not, however, suffer this same prejudice when a jury is determining the truth or falsity of a prior conviction after the conviction of the defendant for the offense charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Hays, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.