Skip to main content

State v. Gifford

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1620

Syllabus

The trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences where the record does not support its finding of great or unusual harm under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(b). The Reagan Tokes Law does not violate principals of separation of powers because the trial court imposes both the minimum and maximum sentences. The state's cross-appeal is dismissed as moot based on court's erroneous imposition of consecutive sentences.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.