Skip to main content

State v. Gibson

Citations

  • 31 A.3d 346
  • 302 Conn. 653
  • 2011 Conn. LEXIS 445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that first step of prosecutorial impro- priety analysis entails factual determination of whether any impropriety occurred
  • noting that ‘‘this court occasionally has skipped the first step of [the two step prosecutorial impropriety] analysis when . . . it was clear that there was no due process vio- lation’’
  • acknowledging that ‘‘there may be some overlap between the factors that the reviewing court considers when determining whether the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and those that it considers when conducting its constitu- tional analysis’’
  • acknowledging that prosecutors should avoid phrases beginning with pronoun \I\
  • noting that ‘‘this court occasionally Page 98 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL November 30, 2021 842 NOVEMBER, 2021 339 Conn. 820 State v. Roy D. L. has skipped the first step of [the two step prosecutorial impropriety] analysis when . . . it was clear that there was no due process violation’’
  • \prosecutor's two uses of the words I think while marshaling the evidence during closing argument .... [was] not improper\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Palmer, Zarella, McLachlan, Eveleigh, Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.