State v. George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Lay witness testimony identifying a person in surveillance footage allowable if the witness has had “sufficient contacts” with the person or the person’s appearance at trial differs from the appearance in the photographs.
• Identification testimony was improper when the testifying officer lacked pre-offense contact with defendants.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Emery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-06-14· cited 1,088×
• State Of Washington v. Zascha Dmitri Sanjurjo-bloom
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-02-08· cited 6×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kirkman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 747×
• State v. Pirtle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 563×
• State v. Powell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-04-13· cited 542×
• State v. Bourgeois
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-11-06· cited 336×
• State v. Magers
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-07-24· cited 317×
• State v. Demery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-09-13· cited 270×
• State v. Yates
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 217×
• United States v. Anthony Lapierre
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-08-19· cited 116×
• State v. Clark
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 99×
• State v. Clark
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 99×
• United States v. Kenneth Towns, Also Known as Kareem Allahdeem
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-11-21· cited 80×
• United States v. Michael Emmett Beck
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-08-10· cited 79×
• United States v. Marshall Jackson
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-09-15· cited 62×
• United States v. Stephen Michael Saniti
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-08-13· cited 57×
• State v. Hardy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-11-18· cited 36×