West Virginia Supreme Court· 7/31/1991

State v. George

Citations

408 S.E.2d 291
185 W. Va. 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that such convictions did not violate constitutional proscriptions against double jeopardy because “the provisions for each offense require proof of an additional fact which the other does not”
“Miranda warnings are required only when a suspect has either been formally arrested or subjected to custodial interrogation.” (quotations and citation omitted)
Attempted murder “requires proof of premeditation or lying in wait along with a specific intent to kill and an overt act toward the commission of the crime[.]”
Attempted murder “requires proof of premeditation or lying in wait along with a specific intent to kill and an overt act toward the commission of the crime[.]”
“It is clear that in this jurisdiction Miranda warnings are required only when a suspect has either been formally arrested or subjected to custodial interrogation.” (quotations and citation omitted)
“It is clear that in this jurisdiction Miranda warnings are required only when a suspect has either been formally arrested or subjected to custodial interrogation.” (quotations and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Workman, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.