Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 10/19/2007
State v. Gault
Citations
- 654 S.E.2d 98
- 375 S.C. 570
- 2007 S.C. App. LEXIS 200
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring a showing of prejudice to include reasonable probability that the jury's verdict was influenced by the challenged evidence
- finding the defendant's argument that his directed verdict motion was improperly denied based on the First Amendment was not preserved for review because the defendant did not raise the specific argument to the magistrate at trial
- finding the defendant's argument that the magistrate improperly denied his directed verdict motion based on the First Amendment was not preserved for review because the defendant did not raise the specific argument to the magistrate at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn, Anderson, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PaganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 319×
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 298×
- State v. WestonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 263×
- Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-02-14· cited 123×
- State v. FreiburgerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-09-26· cited 89×
- State v. HessSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-03-15· cited 24×
- In Re the Care & Treatment of CorleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-07-05· cited 20×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-09· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.