State v. Garza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We note that this section refers to particular and specific offenses 9 which the legislature has deemed inappropriate for probation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-03-28· cited 50×
• Cesar Gomez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-23· cited 41×
• State v. Kersh
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-08-31· cited 20×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-15· cited 1×
• Richard James Randle v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2011-07-29
• Gomez, Cesar
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-04-17
• Barrera, Rey
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-11-20
• Michael Lee Brode v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2024-12-23
• Larry Wayne Carter v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2025-06-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harvey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-02-04· cited 185×
• Ex Parte Poe
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-08· cited 164×
• Alvarez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-08· cited 149×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-26· cited 133×
• Ex Parte Dopps
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-30· cited 104×
• Hughes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-04-25· cited 46×