Washington Supreme Court· 5/19/1994
State v. Garza
Citations
- 872 P.2d 1087
- 123 Wash. 2d 885
- 1994 Wash. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that defendant must make timely and specific challenge to information presented for sentencing court's consideration
- noting that defendant must make timely and specific challenge to information presented for sentencing court’s consideration
- noting that defendant could have requested evidentiary hearing “at which he could controvert information contained in the [presentencing] report”
- to dispute any of the information presented for consideration at a sentencing hearing, a defendant must make a timely and specific challenge
- acknowledgment includes failing to timely object to information contained in a presentence report or to demand an evidentiary hearing to refute that information
- evidentiary hearing not required where defendant fails to specifically object to facts and does not request one
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andersen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BranchWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-01· cited 152×
- State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-15· cited 100×
- State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 93×
- State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-13· cited 46×
- State v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-01· cited 34×
- State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-18· cited 28×
- State v. BluntCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-24· cited 17×
- State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-17· cited 17×
- State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-26· cited 16×
- State v. ZatkovichCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-16· cited 15×
- State v. BluntCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-13· cited 15×
- State v. MorreiraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-26· cited 14×
- State v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-10-30· cited 10×
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-09· cited 9×
- State v. HalgrenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-08-25· cited 6×
- State v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-16· cited 4×
- State v. RandollCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-12· cited 4×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.