Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/13/2003
State v. Blunt
Citations
- 118 Wash. App. 1
- 71 P.3d 657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “most courts have generally declined to extend Mitchell to prohibit inferences from silence in the context of sentence enhancements that do not involve factual details of the underlying crime” and collecting cases
- finding a district court docket printout, bolstered by a court administrator’s testimony, sufficient evidence of a prior DUI conviction
- affirming the defendant’s sentence because the docket bore a minimum indicium of reliability and was not challenged by the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Iowa v. Kenneth Ray Washington IIISupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-06-07· cited 76×
- Hundtofte v. EncarnaciónWashington Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 57×
- In re the Personal Restraint of AdolphWashington Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 43×
- In Re AdolphWashington Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 42×
- State v. BluntCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-24· cited 17×
- State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-17· cited 17×
- State v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-03· cited 15×
- State v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-10-26· cited 12×
- State v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-03-10· cited 10×
- State Of Washington, Respondent/cross v. Thomas Lee Floyd, Appellant/cross-respondentCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-12-17
- Hundtofte v. EncarnacionWashington Supreme Court· 2014-07-24
- State Of Washington v. Patrick Joseph MullenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-03-10
- Bronx Household of Faith v. Bd. of Educ.Second Circuit· 2007-07-02
- State v. BluntCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-13
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 802×
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-06-08· cited 422×
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 399×
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court· 1997-02-06· cited 164×
- United States v. Victor Romero-Rendon, AKA Pedro MacIasNinth Circuit· 2000-07-31· cited 134×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-16· cited 116×
- State v. HandleyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 94×
- Woodall v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 82×
- State v. ShrevesMontana Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 53×
- State v. CabreraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-02-28· cited 42×
- People v. WatkinsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-10-19· cited 42×
- State v. MuscariSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-07-05· cited 37×
- State v. GarzaWashington Supreme Court· 1994-05-19· cited 28×
- Lee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-12-17· cited 26×
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-12· cited 4×
- State v. HeatonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-10-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.