State v. Garrett
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8492
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it failed to instruct the jury on the issue of eyewitness identification pursuant to United States v. Telfaire, 469 F.2d 552, 558-59 (D.C.Cir.1972). Furthermore, appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request that the Telfaire instruction be given in place of the standard jury instruction regarding the credibility of eyewitness identification testimony. The facts of the instant case do not present a situation where the special instruction would have resulted in a different outcome to the case's disposition. Appellant's convictions for aggravated robbery, felonious assault, and kidnapping were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-26· cited 801×
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 509×
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireD.C. Circuit· 1972-06-19· cited 477×
- State v. GusterOhio Supreme Court· 1981-05-27· cited 224×
- State v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-07· cited 38×
- State v. CootsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-16· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.